It’s important to keep up the ridicule of islam and mo on the internet.
The below post is an amusing summary of the serious nature of this case with regard to free speech in America
And here is Steyne’s take. Prof Judith Curry has entered the fray.
I love Rudy. I also love all those supporters (Christie, etc) who stood up for Pres Trump almost from the beginning in the face of ridicule and hostility.
Having said that, I admire Trump for trying to pick the best person for each important job whether that person is/was a personal friend or not. People who are getting angst about the supporters not getting jobs are actually insulting the supporters including Rudy. What they (and Dobbs) are actually saying is that the supporters were only supporters because they wanted a job. This is very insulting.
Trump has made his fortune because he picks the right person for the right job. Down at his core, Trump in an absolutely ruthless person who all his life has run with, and beaten, the big sharks. He has his vision of what he wants to do, and he is going to pick the sharpest knife in the drawer to do it. Period.
People can squeal all they want to, but I believe Trump is going to do everything he said. I believe Trump. Do you? To do that, he needs the big sharks in the tank with him facing the big sharks of Islam, Communism (“Socialists, Left” both in the US and abroad), the UN, China, and the Globalists.
Trump knows we are in WW3, He knows the US is facing ruin unless it gets its financial act together, and he is acting like it in his selections.
The latest racist phrase is “Whitewashing”. This refers to European actors playing different roles of different “ethnicities”.
So? Why shouldn’t they? It is fantasy. Acting is all about role playing. If an actor can play the role, who cares.
I call this another tactic in the racism directed against “whites”. For the ignorant, there are only three races. European, Negroid, and Asian (Mongoloid). Within that European tag there are dark skinned Latinos, Spanish, Arabs, and so on.
Further, latest dna testing says that every human being on this planet can be traced back to one family in Africa.
So we are all one, no matter the colour.
What this is about, is supremacy politics by people with darker skin who are European anyway, who are trying to get away with the same sympathy politics with the Negroid races.
This culture of division and of skin coloured supremacy must stop.
I call those people making this play, as racists.
Andrew Bolt has a good roundup of three articles today on the abolition of the Human Rights Commission. Good to see people finally saying it. However, until that commission is gone, and all the other State ones, there will be no freedom of speech in Australia.
For sheer silliness (not humour) this takes the cake. President Elect Trump is filmed at his acceptance, then also with meeting with President Obama. Then someone runs through the videos, stopping the video at points and selecting stills which show Trump’s expressions. One tape is of him at what.. 2 am?… in the morning after 18 months of grueling campaigning, and manages to find a few areas where he looks tired. Similarly with the tape of him a few days later with Obama. He was actually looking serious at this very serious time and some bright spark at News thinks seriousness is misery?
I was a fan of Greg Sheridan. I looked forward to his analysis of overseas events. I thought he was thoughtful and relatively unbiased.
Wow, was I wrong. Greg Sheridan, in his coverage of the US Republican primaries, and his coverage of Donald Trump, showed Greg to be extremely biased, and worse, totally lacking in research and proper background. His repeating of memes of the left staggered me. I did think he was a conservative person, but his coverage really outed him as yet another leftist on the books of The Australian. I also will take any writings of his in future with a large grain of salt. In other words, Greg Sheridan has lost his credibility as a researcher and opinion maker, another person who has been exposed by Trump.
Another explanation could be that Murdoch leaned on him and everyone at The Australian to give the biased caricature of Trump that the paper did the whole past 18 months.
Anyway, today he manages to again trash President Elect Trump in a musing, wandering, word salad (the accusations thrown at Trump by critics all the time), piece on chivalry.
Now, as a woman who is knowledgeable about the era that he writes about, and who has also been a recipriant of chivalry on many occasions, plus who actively engaged in the wave of feminism from the 60’s onward, I think I know a little bit more about chivalry than Sheridan, and from Sheridan’s columns, I definitely know more about Trump than he does, having read everything I can over the past 18 months of the campaign, and watched many many rallies. I also am not on anyone’s payroll (like Trump lol).
I see this piece as a thinly disguised “virtue signalling” by Sheridan, about how great he is, and he uses (again) the 11 year old tape of Trump talking to Billy Bush. Greg, Trump won. Trump won with women (ie he didn’t lose any more than Romney did). Nearly 50% of women who voted, said that what Trump said to Billy Bush was irrelevant to them in their selection of the candidate. Wow, women were adults about it, who would have guessed? It has nothing to do with chivalry, sexism etc etc bla bla bla. Men have always had two ways of speaking, one in front of women, and one amongst themselves. If you, as a man, didn’t know that, what does that say about you? A nerd who has never had male friends? Or a fibber trying to virtue signal to a female near you.
Get over it Greg, we women have.